Devoted to You.
Winning for Your Future.
A prescription passes through many hands before it reaches you. A doctor chooses the drug and dose. A pharmacist, often working with technicians, checks it, fills it, and labels it. In a hospital, a nurse administers it. Software screens for interactions along the way. The layers exist because the stakes are high: the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or a missed interaction can cause cardiac arrest, kidney or liver failure, or an overdose in a person who followed every instruction they were given.
When one layer fails, and the others do not catch it, the patient absorbs the harm. Vahdat Weisman Law represents Michigan patients and families injured by preventable medication and pharmacy errors, whether the mistake happened in a hospital, a doctor’s office, or at the counter of a chain pharmacy. Call (734) 469-4994 for a free, confidential consultation, any hour of the day. You pay no attorney fee unless we recover compensation for you.
Common enough that the FDA receives more than 100,000 reports of suspected medication errors every year, a voluntary reporting system that captures only a slice of what actually happens. Hospital research going back decades has found adverse drug events in roughly 6 of every 100 admissions, a meaningful share of them preventable. Most errors cause little or no lasting harm. The serious injuries cluster around a predictable list that patient-safety organizations call high-alert medications, drugs like blood thinners, insulin, opioids, sedatives, and chemotherapy, where an error is especially likely to cause severe harm.
That predictability matters legally. When the same drugs, the same look-alike names, and the same failure points have been documented for decades, providers and pharmacies are expected to maintain safeguards against them. An error at a known danger point is where our investigation starts, because it usually means asking which safeguard was missing, bypassed, or ignored, and whether that fell below the standard of care.
Here is something most people, and some lawyers, get wrong: not every medication error case in Michigan is a medical malpractice case, and the classification changes the deadlines and requirements.
Claims that challenge a licensed professional’s judgment, a physician’s prescribing decision, or a pharmacist’s professional call generally proceed under Michigan’s medical malpractice rules, with the pre-suit notice, expert affidavit, and two-year limitations framework that comes with them. But the Michigan Supreme Court has held that a pharmacy itself is not a licensed health facility under the malpractice statutes, and errors that do not involve professional judgment, -a technician’s miscount, a clerical mix-up, a corporate operational failure-, may sound in ordinary negligence instead, with different deadlines, including a longer basic limitations period, and no affidavit-of-merit requirement. Michigan courts have also defined the limits of a pharmacist’s duties: a pharmacy that properly fills a lawful prescription is generally not liable merely for failing to warn about side effects, but a pharmacy that advertises interaction screening, or whose own system flags a danger that is then ignored, can be held to the duty it took on.
We sort out the classification at the start of every case, because it determines the clock, the experts, and the strategy. It is one of the quiet ways medication cases get lost by firms that treat them all the same.
The prescriber answers for choosing an appropriate drug and dose, checking allergies and current medications, and arranging the monitoring the drug requires. The pharmacist answers for accurate dispensing and for the professional judgment pharmacists are licensed to exercise, and the pharmacy behind them, often a national chain, answers for its employees and can face scrutiny of its own staffing levels, workload policies, and safety systems where the evidence ties them to the error. The hospital or nursing home answers for its nurses and staff acting within their roles, its medication administration systems, and its own protocol failures. In some situations, the problem is not provider error at all but a defective or mislabeled product, which becomes a different kind of case against a manufacturer.
If your medication error happened in the emergency department, it connects with our ER negligence work. Wherever the failure sits, the analysis starts the same way: what did each person in the chain owe you, and which of them fell short.
Medications carry real risks even when everyone does everything right. A properly prescribed drug can cause a side effect no one could predict, and an appropriately chosen antibiotic can trigger a first-time allergic reaction. Those situations, painful as they are, are usually not malpractice, and we will tell you so honestly.
What we look for is the preventable failure, and the evidence trail behind it: the prescription as transmitted, the pharmacy’s dispensing records and screening alerts, override codes and verification logs, the pill bottle and its contents, hospital medication administration records, and the electronic audit trail. Some of that evidence is overwritten quickly, surveillance video and call recordings especially, so early preservation letters matter. So does physical evidence. Keep the bottle, the remaining pills, the packaging, and the receipts, and photograph everything, including the imprint codes on the pills themselves. If a pharmacy asks to take the prescription back for review, understand that you are holding the best evidence in the case. Independent pill identification and laboratory analysis exist for exactly these disputes.
Proof also means causation: connecting the error to your injury through timing, dosing, lab trends, and expert testimony, and separating what the drug did from what an underlying illness was already doing. That is where the defense will fight, and where our experts earn their place in the case.
For claims that proceed as medical malpractice, Michigan generally allows two years from the negligent act or omission under MCL 600.5805, with an alternative window of six months from when you discovered or reasonably should have discovered the claim under MCL 600.5838a, whichever is later, with the burden on the patient to establish late discovery, and a six-year outer limit with narrow exceptions. A notice of intent must be served generally 182 days before filing under MCL 600.2912b; a proper and timely notice can pause the limitations clock, though the technical requirements are exacting. The complaint must include an affidavit of merit from a qualified expert under MCL 600.2912d. Claims that proceed as ordinary negligence follow different rules and a different clock, which is precisely why the classification analysis comes first.
Medication errors carry a particular discovery problem: patients often have no idea their harm came from a drug mistake. They were told their condition worsened or their body reacted badly, when in fact the dose was wrong for months. If something about a medical decline never made sense, the records may explain why, and the discovery rules may preserve a claim you assumed was too old. That analysis deserves a lawyer’s eyes before you write the case off.
Medication errors can cause catastrophic or fatal harm when healthcare providers prescribe, dispense, or administer the wrong medication or dosage. Our medical malpractice attorneys represent patients and families throughout Michigan in these complex cases, working to hold negligent providers accountable and recover compensation for the full extent of their losses.
Get medical help immediately and bring the medication with you; treating a reaction or overdose depends on knowing exactly what was taken. Poison Control at 1-800-222-1222 can guide the first minutes. Do not abruptly stop a prescribed medication without medical advice, because stopping some drugs suddenly is its own danger.
Then protect the evidence: the bottle, the pills, the packaging, the printout, the receipt, photographed before anyone takes them back. Request your records early, including the prescription as written, the pharmacy dispensing history, and hospital medication administration records if the error happened as an inpatient. Write down the timeline and every conversation.
And before you sign anything, a release, a settlement, any document a pharmacy or insurer puts in front of you, find out what the error actually did to your health. Some medication injuries, especially to the kidneys and liver, reveal themselves in lab work over months. A refund costs a pharmacy almost nothing. A signed release can end a claim before anyone knows its real size.
Medication cases reward thoroughness. The evidence is scattered across prescribers, pharmacies, and hospitals, and in multi-defendant cases each will predictably point to the others. We follow the entire chain, sort the malpractice claims from the ordinary negligence claims, identify every professional who had a duty to catch the error, and match qualified experts to each issue as Michigan law requires. We advance all case costs, and you pay no attorney fee unless we recover compensation for you.
Founding partners Kara E. Weisman and Jordan S. Vahdat have each been honored as Super Lawyers Rising Stars, and our attorneys are members of the State Bar of Michigan and active in the Michigan Association for Justice. From our Livonia office, we serve clients across Michigan, with Spanish-speaking staff available and phones answered 24/7.
If a medication mistake hurt you or someone you love, the chain of responsibility deserves a hard look. Call Vahdat Weisman Law at (734) 469-4994 or contact us online for a free, confidential consultation. Available 24/7, serving all of Michigan.
Dedicated to Justice. Devoted to You. Winning for Your Future.
This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every case is unique, and prior results do not guarantee future success.